Recently I received an advance copy of a new publication called *Assessment in Schools: Fit for Purpose?* The ARG publication reports the findings from a massive multi-year research project in the UK entitled LEARNING HOW TO LEARN. (Mansell, W., James, M. & the Assessment Reform Group (2009) Assessment in schools. Fit for purpose? A Commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme. London: Economic and Social Research Council, Teaching and Learning Research Programme.) Clarifying the distinctions between formative and summative uses of assessment, it states,
“... ‘Formative’ is the use of day-to-day, often information, assessments to explore pupils’ understanding so that the teacher can best decide how to help them to develop that understanding. ‘Summative’ is the more formal summing-up of a pupil’s progress that can then be used for purposes ranging from providing information to parents to certification as part of a form evaluation course.
It should be noted that assessments can often be used for both formative and summative purposes. ‘Formative’ and ‘Summative’ are not labels for different types or forms of assessment but describe how assessments are used.”
Here is an example of using evidence of learning for both purposes:
Students who are striving to develop mathematical ‘habits of mind’ might select, as proof of their growth in this area, practice work from over the term. Earlier in the term, the practice work might have been used in a formative way by both the teacher and the student. Examining the practice work during the term helped both teacher and student review current understandings and consider next steps for learning. Later, towards the end of the term, the very same practice work might be selected by the student to help show growth towards the mathematical ‘habits of mind’ embedded in learning outcomes or standards. This collection of samples would become part of the evidence the teacher uses in the summative assessment.
More ideas are described in CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT: WHAT’S WORKING IN HIGH SCHOOLS? In her chapter called “Reflective Assessment in Mathematics,” Melissa Labbe discusses how she reports on her high school math students’ learning using a grading structure that involves assessments, assignments, portfolios and attendance/participation. (Chapter 17 can be found in Book Two on page 79.)
____________________________________________________
“I believe that the testing of the student's achievements in order to see if he meets some criterion held by the teacher, is directly contrary to the implications of therapy for significant learning.”
~ Carl Rogers
“We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are.”
~ Anais Nin
Find out more about the IPPY Award winning books for High School teachers at:
connect2learning.com/store/publications/classroom-assessment-what-s-working-in-higschools